Skyscanner Live vs Indicative Prices

Compare Skyscanner Flights Live Prices and Indicative Prices across freshness, use case, latency, booking confidence and rate limits.

Editorial information
Advertisement

Live and Indicative APIs do not provide the same pricing confidence. Live Prices queries supply partners for a concrete search context; Indicative Prices provides cached lowest-price signals for browse and discovery use cases.

Comparison

DimensionLive PricesIndicative Prices
FreshnessReal-time partner searchCached
Skyscanner docsCurrent best pricesLast-seen lowest price
Cache ageCreate can return a fast cached subset before polling completesPrices can be up to 4 days old
Use caseBookable flight searchBrowse, SEO, flexible date/destination
Workflowcreate + pollsingle search
Booking confidenceHigherLower / estimate
Standard rate limitsCreate 100/s,100/min; Poll 100/s,500/min100/s,500/min

Live workflow

text
/create
 -> fast initial subset
 -> sessionToken
 -> /poll
 -> fuller live result set
 -> itinerary refresh if needed

Measure time to first result separately from time to completion.

Indicative workflow

The indicative cache stores lowest prices seen from traveler/supply searches by route/date. It is not an exact bookable price.

It fits month calendars, destination inspiration, SEO price ranges and budget exploration.

Anti-pattern

Do not present indicative price as:

  • checkout price,
  • guaranteed fare,
  • bookable offer.

Product architecture

text
Low intent discovery -> Indicative
High intent search   -> Live
Selected itinerary  -> Refresh
Booking handoff      -> Agent/provider

Observability

Track indicative cache age, live time-to-first-result, live time-to-complete, indicative→live delta, live→refresh delta and landing-price mismatch.

Technical advisory

Planning a similar integration?

We can review requirements, feed/API design and the production approach with you.

Discuss your project →

Sources

Related content